5 Very High relevance to you
2025

Julia Creek–Richmond Critical Minerals Zone: Water Delivery Options Strategic Assessment (Stage 1)

Julia Creek–Richmond Critical Minerals Zone: Water Delivery Options Strategic Assessment (Stage 1)
Report

This Queensland Government summary report outlines Stage 1 findings on water delivery options to support critical minerals development in the Julia Creek–Richmond zone.

  • Positions reliable water access as the key constraint for industry growth in the zone
  • Models ‘most likely’ demand of 12 100 ML per annum by 2029, with P90 up to 19 200 ML per annum
  • Assesses longlist options including Julius Dam pipeline, offstream storages, desalination, and instream storages
  • Shortlists Option 5 (offstream storage near Etta Plains) and Option 1 (Julius Dam pipeline) via multi-criteria assessment
  • Identifies potential groundwater contribution of 14 600–22 000 ML per annum, recommending staged investigation
  • Notes Gulf Water Plan review underway with final plan expected in 2027 to enable allocation reforms

Content shared in this community may be provided by external contributors. Copyright and responsibility for opinions expressed rest with the original authors.

How this may be relevant to you

Very High
Your relevance score
Highly relevant. Examine the resource to gain the full value for your focus area.

This report guides proponents and suppliers on feasible common-user water solutions for project planning and approvals.

  • Clarifies demand scenarios to size pipelines and storages (12 100–16 500 ML/a design cases)
  • Compares delivery timeframes (-5 years for Julius pipeline; -5 years approvals+construction for OSS) for schedule alignment
  • Highlights reliability differences (WSI ~99.8% Julius vs ~94.9% OSS) to inform process water risk management
  • Flags groundwater conjunctive use to reduce capex and scale infrastructure needs
  • Sets out regulatory constraints and pathways (Water Plan reserves, trades, harvesting limits) for compliance planning
  • Provides MCA ranking to prioritise engagement with preferred options and corridors

Content shared in this community may be provided by external contributors. Copyright and responsibility for opinions expressed rest with the original authors.

Have a question? Ask an expert!

Tell us what you want to understand better, and our trusted Experts will offer their perspective.
Visit our FAQs page to learn more about our ‘Ask the Expert’ feature.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Topics you may like

Cumulative impacts

Protected area and habitats

Noise and vibration

Land, soil and agricultural impacts